Perhaps you attended a session on Millennials at the annual conference of New Jersey Organization Development professionals held May 4 in Newark NJ. The workshop “Lessons Learned from Millennials—Deep Seeing, Inspired Thinking” co-presented Jeana Wirtenberg and Elena Feliz, was based on my college student essays collected over the past 25 years. It also grew out of my professional teacher development using imaginement ® a tool for assessing attentional seeing and the thinking process it engenders at the museum. I found that millennials had a fascinating capacity for higher order thinking when it came to looking at artifacts particularly from Asian cultures.
Reading student essays about their encounter with an Asian art object over the years has taught me a thing or two. First, how we have mislabeled millennial students through such (derogatory) terms as ‘narcissistic,’ ‘self-absorbed’ individuals with short attention spans. Time and again, my community college students wrote about their process of deep seeing and thinking in their written first reports about time spent pleasantly during intimate encounters with art in the museum. They also showed the way in which a freely imaginative mind is not only at the core of all vital art making, but also in looking at art 
While some scholars might question the validity of a creative essay in place of the traditional art history research paper, yet as Dan Gilbert from Harvard told me, first report essays are considered the gold standard in the field of economics and psychology. The essays also deepened my understanding of my own research on Chinese Painting and why Confucian bureaucrats, who were polymaths in their own right, always played the ‘amateur card’ when it came to their painting, calligraphy and poetry, which more often than not was masterful. The inverse is that the student non-experts wrote eloquently about a work of art while imagining what was in the mind of the creator arriving at an insightful judgment about it. What then is this ‘sweet spot’ that lies within the field of acquired expert knowledge yet outside it in the realm of ideas? For the maestro, Aaron Copland, it was not an enigma at all: the amateur listener excited him because he or she brought a sensitivity that was totally lacking of prejudices and preconceptions of the professional musician. To Copland, the amateur has the “ability to lend herself to the music while simultaneously getting both the event and the idealization of the event.” Like the ‘virtuoso’ amateur listener, the student viewer has the same uncanny ability to get absorbed into the art and hang in the midst of expectation and attention while being fully present to the moment. In an act of elevated cognition the amateur presents as a sentient being given over to the power of art. 
Now here’s the rub: for more than two millennia, Confucian scholars sought to tap its ancient wisdom tradition through the arts. Millennial students seem ‘hardwired’ for it with the museum as their virtual laboratory. When it comes to sustainability, we would be wise to ‘listen up’ and look around at what psychologist Henry James referred to as invaluable, continually renewable sources of energy; i.e. what Millennials can model to the rest of us is their indubitable ability to see and think out of the box. Now if only we have the eyes to see this for here may lay our nation’s greatest resource of sustainable value. And if you were there, post your thoughts. We would love to hear from you!
Philosopher Susanne Langer wrote of the imaginative mind at the core of all music making and listening. Feeling and Form, pg. 336. See if you agree with the other music metaphors I employed here.
Aaron Copland. Music and Imagination. 1952, pp. 9-13.